catholic (small c): Of broad or liberal scope; comprehensive.
Catholic with a small ‘c’ may be used to describe
the voting habits of Catholics with a big ‘C’ after last week’s election. Obama won the Catholic vote by a 50-48 vote,
almost exactly his margin among voters nationally, proving once and for all that
there is no such thing as the Catholic vote.
You could say that the catholics outvoted the Catholics based on their
catholic views and not their Catholic views.
Amen.
It was not for lack of trying by the Catholic
hierarchy. The Church as an organization
was transparent in its push for the Romney/Ryan ticket. It not so cleverly tried to disguise its
preference for the Republican ticket with its hyperbolic War on Religion and
the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ “Fortnight for Freedom” campaign. Both were designed to drum up opposition to
Obamacare directly and by extension, Obama himself. Didn’t work out.
At issue was the ACA’s mandate that health plans
include contraception as part of the standard package of minimum benefits. Churches were exempt from the mandate but not
religiously affiliated institutions, like Catholic hospitals and schools. That was untenable for the men in charge.
The weekly pulpit message sounded something like
this: “We’re not telling you how to vote exactly,
in order to protect our tax favored status. You understand. But if the candidate on the ballot wants to
take away your freedom and his name is Obama, well then you should prayerfully
consider your options and remember that you’ll burn in Hell if you don’t cast
your vote for the candidate of life and freedom bearing the initials WMR.”
Here’s why the Church campaign failed to sway the
Catholic vote:
Too
Much: When everything is described
as “unprecedented”, or a “direct assault on Catholics’ ability to practice
their faith”, or compared to totalitarian practices, pew dwellers tune
out. The over the top verbiage becomes
self-defeating at some point, and frankly unbelievable. Most people saw the controversy over the
contraception mandate as a policy debate and not a theological discussion. On top of that, most Catholics had used birth
control, so they weren’t afraid of it.
Not
“Unprecedented”: 26 states
already had such a birth control mandate on the books, so “unprecedented”
wasn’t accurate as a descriptor. Beyond
that, Maryland
parish priest Fr. Peter Daly wrote in the National Catholic Reporter on how far
a reach the use of “unprecedented” was:
Bishops
said that never before had people been required to violate their religious
conscience to comply with the law. But every day, we tax Quakers and other
religious pacifists to support wars. Jehovah’s Witnesses pay Medicare taxes for
blood transfusions. Seventh-day Adventists in the military must report to duty
on Saturdays. Mormons had to give up their cherished practice of polygamy as
the price for bringing Utah into the Union. The fact is that religious liberty has never been
absolute.
I'll bet Fr. Daly can expect a strongly worded letter to arrive soon from his superiors.
Question
Authority: The
Church hierarchy was in lock step behind Romney (or at least against Obama if
not for Romney). The problem with translating
that message into votes from the faithful is that the Church hierarchy has had
some high profile credibility issues lately.
That credibility gap with the average Catholic had to blunt the power of
their message about the war on religious freedom. The more legal settlements that the Church pays out, the more parishioners start to question authority.
Fortnight
Failure: Ed Kilgore
in the Washington Monthly wrote about the Church Fortnight for Freedom campaign that:
Fortnight
for Freedom was perceived as a partisan effort to influence the election.
The
bishops, of course, did not intend to be partisan and vociferously denied that
they were partisan, but both sides of the political equation perceived
“Fortnight” as an effort to defeat President Barack Obama. I went to one
Knights of Columbus
meeting that ended with a blunt appeal to “get behind our bishops” and defeat
the president.
No one was fooled that Fortnight for Freedom
wasn’t a single minded partisan event created for the sole purpose of gather
support to oust the President. As my
parish priest once said, and I paraphrase, "the problem with Catholics isn’t the
faith; it’s the marketing.” Fortnight
for Freedom was a marketing disaster.
Catholics did not fall in line and in fact, the needle against Obama
didn’t even move.
The grand takeaway is that hopefully the myth of
the monolithic Catholic vote is now dead and buried, never to be resurrected by
some future pollster as a wedge.
Contrary to the wishes of the Church power structure, Catholics tend to
vote for the candidate they think is best on a wide range of issues, the same
way other voters choose. It’s not
unprecedented.
No comments:
Post a Comment